Extension of Jotun Ceasefire
(Created page with "==Acceptance== <ic>To extend the treaty with the Jotun.<br><br>Proposed by Bastion, seconded by Hahnmark.</ic> ===Overview=== * Accept the proposed extension to the Accept ...") |
Responsible1 (talk | contribs) m (→Overview) |
||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== | ==Overview== | ||
<ic>To extend the treaty with the Jotun. | The Jotun have requested a further two year extension of the current ceasefire between them and the Empire. | ||
==Date== | |||
* [[Extension of Jotun Ceasefire#Rejection|Rejected Spring Equinox 378YE]] - [[378YE_Spring_Equinox_Synod_judgements#Synod_Judgments|Vetoed by the Synod]] | |||
* [[Extension of Jotun Ceasefire#Accepted|Accepted Spring Equinox 378YE]] | |||
==Accepted== | |||
<ic>To extend the treaty with the Jotun. | |||
Proposed by Bastion, seconded by Hahnmark.</ic> | |||
===Overview=== | ===Overview=== | ||
* Accept the proposed extension to the [[Accept Jotun ceasefire|Jotun ceasefire]] treaty. | * Accept the proposed extension to the [[Accept Jotun ceasefire|Jotun ceasefire]] treaty. | ||
* A prior motion to reject the ceasefire was [[veto|vetoed]] by the [[Imperial Synod]]. | |||
* | |||
===Campaign Outcome=== | ===Campaign Outcome=== | ||
* The Senate agreed to accept the proposed extension. | * The Senate agreed to accept the proposed extension. The treaty will now end at the start of the Spring Equinox summit 380YE. | ||
===Constitution=== | ===Constitution=== | ||
A motion that is vetoed by the Imperial Synod would not normally be eligible to be raised again at that Summit. However this rule exists to ensure that the Senate are not able to circumvent the oversight of the Synod. In this situation, where it is clear that the Senate wished to take account of the views of the Synod and time was pressing, it is reasonable for the motion to be raised again. | |||
===Voting=== | ===Voting=== | ||
| Line 23: | Line 30: | ||
|} | |} | ||
==Rejected== | |||
<ic>To reject the proposed extension to the Jotan treaty. To send a response to the Jotan formally declining the request to extend the treaty. | |||
Proposed by Mitwold, seconded by Kallavesa.</ic> | |||
===Overview=== | ===Overview=== | ||
* Reject the proposed extension to the [[Accept Jotun ceasefire|Jotun ceasefire]] treaty. | * Reject the proposed extension to the [[Accept Jotun ceasefire|Jotun ceasefire]] treaty. | ||
===Synod Veto=== | ===Synod Veto=== | ||
* This motion was vetoed by the [[The_Assemblies_of_the_Synod#The_General_Assembly|General Assembly of the Imperial Synod]] | * This motion was vetoed by the [[The_Assemblies_of_the_Synod#The_General_Assembly|General Assembly of the Imperial Synod]] | ||
===Voting=== | ===Voting=== | ||
| Line 53: | Line 50: | ||
|} | |} | ||
[[Category:Failed Senate Motion]] | |||
[[Category:Vetoed Senate Motion]] | |||
[[Category: 378YE Spring]] | |||
__NOTOC__ | |||
Latest revision as of 18:06, 20 June 2022
Overview
The Jotun have requested a further two year extension of the current ceasefire between them and the Empire.
Date
Accepted
To extend the treaty with the Jotun.
Proposed by Bastion, seconded by Hahnmark.
Overview
- Accept the proposed extension to the Jotun ceasefire treaty.
- A prior motion to reject the ceasefire was vetoed by the Imperial Synod.
Campaign Outcome
- The Senate agreed to accept the proposed extension. The treaty will now end at the start of the Spring Equinox summit 380YE.
Constitution
A motion that is vetoed by the Imperial Synod would not normally be eligible to be raised again at that Summit. However this rule exists to ensure that the Senate are not able to circumvent the oversight of the Synod. In this situation, where it is clear that the Senate wished to take account of the views of the Synod and time was pressing, it is reasonable for the motion to be raised again.
Voting
| State | Votes For | Votes Against | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| In Principle | Unanimous | 0 | Passed |
Rejected
To reject the proposed extension to the Jotan treaty. To send a response to the Jotan formally declining the request to extend the treaty.
Proposed by Mitwold, seconded by Kallavesa.
Overview
- Reject the proposed extension to the Jotun ceasefire treaty.
Synod Veto
- This motion was vetoed by the General Assembly of the Imperial Synod
Voting
| State | Votes For | Votes Against | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| In Principle | 24 | 4 | Passed |