It's what we do - Revision history

Rafferty: /* Weeds and Seeds */

2026-08-17T12:47:57Z

Weeds and Seeds

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:47, 17 August 2026
Line 115:		Line 115:
	* '''Yerende Apothecaries want the sodality to focus on supporting others rather than its own members'''		* '''Yerende Apothecaries want the sodality to focus on supporting others rather than its own members'''
	* '''The Yerende would enable a new herbal school to be commissioned if Thornsong House is destroyed provided it is under the control of the Apothecaries' Guild'''		* '''The Yerende would enable a new herbal school to be commissioned if Thornsong House is destroyed provided it is under the control of the Apothecaries' Guild'''
	This opportunity has been ~~superceded~~ by that discussed in the [[Come together]] wind of fortune		This opportunity has been superseded by that discussed in the [[Come together]] wind of fortune
	The [[Yerende]] are one of the [[sept\|septs]] of the [[Imperial Orcs]]. The arts of the apothecary are central to their history and culture - as much as magic is to the Urizeni. It is not surprising then that they have taken a strong interest in the new Apothecaries' Guild. Unlike others, they are not concerned about being paid, being an apothecary is more like a philosophical perspective to the Yerende than a profession. They see the world as a [[Yerende#The_Great_Garden\|great garden]], one that must be diligently cared for requiring long hours of hard physical work, planning and care.		The [[Yerende]] are one of the [[sept\|septs]] of the [[Imperial Orcs]]. The arts of the apothecary are central to their history and culture - as much as magic is to the Urizeni. It is not surprising then that they have taken a strong interest in the new Apothecaries' Guild. Unlike others, they are not concerned about being paid, being an apothecary is more like a philosophical perspective to the Yerende than a profession. They see the world as a [[Yerende#The_Great_Garden\|great garden]], one that must be diligently cared for requiring long hours of hard physical work, planning and care.

Rafferty: /* Weeds and Seeds */

2026-08-17T12:46:52Z

Weeds and Seeds

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:46, 17 August 2026
Line 115:		Line 115:
	* '''Yerende Apothecaries want the sodality to focus on supporting others rather than its own members'''		* '''Yerende Apothecaries want the sodality to focus on supporting others rather than its own members'''
	* '''The Yerende would enable a new herbal school to be commissioned if Thornsong House is destroyed provided it is under the control of the Apothecaries' Guild'''		* '''The Yerende would enable a new herbal school to be commissioned if Thornsong House is destroyed provided it is under the control of the Apothecaries' Guild'''
			This opportunity has been superceded by that discussed in the [[Come together]] wind of fortune
	The [[Yerende]] are one of the [[sept\|septs]] of the [[Imperial Orcs]]. The arts of the apothecary are central to their history and culture - as much as magic is to the Urizeni. It is not surprising then that they have taken a strong interest in the new Apothecaries' Guild. Unlike others, they are not concerned about being paid, being an apothecary is more like a philosophical perspective to the Yerende than a profession. They see the world as a [[Yerende#The_Great_Garden\|great garden]], one that must be diligently cared for requiring long hours of hard physical work, planning and care.		The [[Yerende]] are one of the [[sept\|septs]] of the [[Imperial Orcs]]. The arts of the apothecary are central to their history and culture - as much as magic is to the Urizeni. It is not surprising then that they have taken a strong interest in the new Apothecaries' Guild. Unlike others, they are not concerned about being paid, being an apothecary is more like a philosophical perspective to the Yerende than a profession. They see the world as a [[Yerende#The_Great_Garden\|great garden]], one that must be diligently cared for requiring long hours of hard physical work, planning and care.

Line 149:		Line 150:
	In addition to the changing the focus of the Guild, they want the Senate to consider granting the Guild the legal power to disseminate knowledge of new potions. In their view, there is clearly nobody better suited to this work than the new Apothecaries' Guild - the sodality should have more knowledge and experience of these issues than any other body in the Empire - it only makes sense that they be given this power.		In addition to the changing the focus of the Guild, they want the Senate to consider granting the Guild the legal power to disseminate knowledge of new potions. In their view, there is clearly nobody better suited to this work than the new Apothecaries' Guild - the sodality should have more knowledge and experience of these issues than any other body in the Empire - it only makes sense that they be given this power.
	<div style="float:right; width: 250px; clear: left;">{{CaptionedImage\|file=HoodedMan.jpg\|caption=Some argue that poisons and drugs are as much the remit of the Guild as wholesome potions - perhaps even more so.\|align=right\|width=250}}</div>		<div style="float:right; width: 250px; clear: left;">{{CaptionedImage\|file=HoodedMan.jpg\|caption=Some argue that poisons and drugs are as much the remit of the Guild as wholesome potions - perhaps even more so.\|align=right\|width=250}}</div>

	===Iron & Wine ===		===Iron & Wine ===
	* '''Varushkan and Navarr apothecaries want the sodality to have the power to interdict potions'''		* '''Varushkan and Navarr apothecaries want the sodality to have the power to interdict potions'''

Matt: Text replacement - "Conclave" to "Conclave"

2026-01-16T09:38:53Z

Text replacement - "Conclave" to "Conclave"

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:38, 16 January 2026
Line 71:		Line 71:
	* '''It would be illegal to mix, own or sell an interdicted potion'''		* '''It would be illegal to mix, own or sell an interdicted potion'''
	* '''Magistrates would seek to destroy the herbal of an interdicted potion that was not part of Imperial Lore'''		* '''Magistrates would seek to destroy the herbal of an interdicted potion that was not part of Imperial Lore'''
	The Apothecaries' Guild is the only body of state with legally defined responsibilities for the apothecary art. However, the terms of the manifesto place significant limits on the power of the Guild to prevent the use of potions that pose a danger to the Empire or its citizens. It states that the sodality will ''"Serve as a point of contact for bodies of state when apothecary and herbal advice is required"''. The implication is that the intention is that the [[~~Conclave\|~~Conclave]] and the Senate continue to regulate the use of potions either by making them illegal with a Senate motion or by interdiction with a Conclave declaration.		The Apothecaries' Guild is the only body of state with legally defined responsibilities for the apothecary art. However, the terms of the manifesto place significant limits on the power of the Guild to prevent the use of potions that pose a danger to the Empire or its citizens. It states that the sodality will ''"Serve as a point of contact for bodies of state when apothecary and herbal advice is required"''. The implication is that the intention is that the [[Conclave]] and the Senate continue to regulate the use of potions either by making them illegal with a Senate motion or by interdiction with a Conclave declaration.

	The court are clear that the Senate ''could'' choose to grant the sodality the power to interdict potions or a single potion recipe. This would require a [[Senate_motion#Constitutional_Vote\|constitutional vote]] as it would strip the Conclave of any power or responsibility over potions and poisons. It would also prevent the Imperial Senate from making decisions on the creation, sale, or use of such a potion. Any existing potions that were interdicted would remain interdicted, but control of their status would pass to the Guild. A simple vote of Guild members would be sufficient to interdict a potion - or to remove interdiction from a potion.		The court are clear that the Senate ''could'' choose to grant the sodality the power to interdict potions or a single potion recipe. This would require a [[Senate_motion#Constitutional_Vote\|constitutional vote]] as it would strip the Conclave of any power or responsibility over potions and poisons. It would also prevent the Imperial Senate from making decisions on the creation, sale, or use of such a potion. Any existing potions that were interdicted would remain interdicted, but control of their status would pass to the Guild. A simple vote of Guild members would be sufficient to interdict a potion - or to remove interdiction from a potion.

Matt: Text replacement - "[[Imperial Conclave" to "[[Conclave"

2026-01-15T16:51:53Z

Text replacement - "[[Imperial Conclave" to "[[Conclave"

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:51, 15 January 2026
Line 71:		Line 71:
	* '''It would be illegal to mix, own or sell an interdicted potion'''		* '''It would be illegal to mix, own or sell an interdicted potion'''
	* '''Magistrates would seek to destroy the herbal of an interdicted potion that was not part of Imperial Lore'''		* '''Magistrates would seek to destroy the herbal of an interdicted potion that was not part of Imperial Lore'''
	The Apothecaries' Guild is the only body of state with legally defined responsibilities for the apothecary art. However, the terms of the manifesto place significant limits on the power of the Guild to prevent the use of potions that pose a danger to the Empire or its citizens. It states that the sodality will ''"Serve as a point of contact for bodies of state when apothecary and herbal advice is required"''. The implication is that the intention is that the [[~~Imperial~~ Conclave\|Conclave]] and the Senate continue to regulate the use of potions either by making them illegal with a Senate motion or by interdiction with a Conclave declaration.		The Apothecaries' Guild is the only body of state with legally defined responsibilities for the apothecary art. However, the terms of the manifesto place significant limits on the power of the Guild to prevent the use of potions that pose a danger to the Empire or its citizens. It states that the sodality will ''"Serve as a point of contact for bodies of state when apothecary and herbal advice is required"''. The implication is that the intention is that the [[Conclave\|Conclave]] and the Senate continue to regulate the use of potions either by making them illegal with a Senate motion or by interdiction with a Conclave declaration.

	The court are clear that the Senate ''could'' choose to grant the sodality the power to interdict potions or a single potion recipe. This would require a [[Senate_motion#Constitutional_Vote\|constitutional vote]] as it would strip the Conclave of any power or responsibility over potions and poisons. It would also prevent the Imperial Senate from making decisions on the creation, sale, or use of such a potion. Any existing potions that were interdicted would remain interdicted, but control of their status would pass to the Guild. A simple vote of Guild members would be sufficient to interdict a potion - or to remove interdiction from a potion.		The court are clear that the Senate ''could'' choose to grant the sodality the power to interdict potions or a single potion recipe. This would require a [[Senate_motion#Constitutional_Vote\|constitutional vote]] as it would strip the Conclave of any power or responsibility over potions and poisons. It would also prevent the Imperial Senate from making decisions on the creation, sale, or use of such a potion. Any existing potions that were interdicted would remain interdicted, but control of their status would pass to the Guild. A simple vote of Guild members would be sufficient to interdict a potion - or to remove interdiction from a potion.
Line 154:		Line 154:
	The skills of the apothecary can heal the body and empower the soul, but they can also be used to poison and kill. The Navarr are not shy about this fundamental truth, many of their apothecaries have a great deal of experience creating poisons as the nation are skilled at using them in battle against the Empire's enemies. On more than one occasion, they have expressed frustration with the simple approach to poisons adopted by Imperial law and suggested that the Empire would be better served by an arrangement closer to the one that applies to curses.		The skills of the apothecary can heal the body and empower the soul, but they can also be used to poison and kill. The Navarr are not shy about this fundamental truth, many of their apothecaries have a great deal of experience creating poisons as the nation are skilled at using them in battle against the Empire's enemies. On more than one occasion, they have expressed frustration with the simple approach to poisons adopted by Imperial law and suggested that the Empire would be better served by an arrangement closer to the one that applies to curses.

	Magic that harms a citizen is legal in the Empire, in part because of the potential to turn curses on the Empire's enemies but largely because the constitution ensures that the [[~~Imperial~~ Conclave]] control the uses of curses (and other magic) through the use of [[interdiction]] and [[sorcery]]. In the view of many Navarr, the Apothecaries' Guild could be built up to operate in a similar way, giving it power over the use of potions and poisons and over the people who create them.		Magic that harms a citizen is legal in the Empire, in part because of the potential to turn curses on the Empire's enemies but largely because the constitution ensures that the [[Conclave]] control the uses of curses (and other magic) through the use of [[interdiction]] and [[sorcery]]. In the view of many Navarr, the Apothecaries' Guild could be built up to operate in a similar way, giving it power over the use of potions and poisons and over the people who create them.

	That would require a number of substantial changes to Imperial law, all of which are likely to require a constitutional vote. Crucially, the current responsibilities of the sodality, as defined by the Senate in its manifesto, do not really allow for such power. The manifesto says only that the Guild will ''"serve as a point of contact for bodies of state when apothecary and herbal advice is required."'' That is no legal basis for wide-sweeping powers to control the use of the apothecary's arts in that statement. Not currently, at least.		That would require a number of substantial changes to Imperial law, all of which are likely to require a constitutional vote. Crucially, the current responsibilities of the sodality, as defined by the Senate in its manifesto, do not really allow for such power. The manifesto says only that the Guild will ''"serve as a point of contact for bodies of state when apothecary and herbal advice is required."'' That is no legal basis for wide-sweeping powers to control the use of the apothecary's arts in that statement. Not currently, at least.

Matt: Text replacement - "[[Imperial Senate" to "[[Senate"

2026-01-15T13:04:35Z

Text replacement - "[[Imperial Senate" to "[[Senate"

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:04, 15 January 2026
Line 46:		Line 46:
	* '''The Senate could devolve a number of powers to the sodality'''		* '''The Senate could devolve a number of powers to the sodality'''
	* '''Senate could grant the sodality the power to interdict potions'''		* '''Senate could grant the sodality the power to interdict potions'''
	The [[Scrutiny#Constitutional_Court\|Constitutional Court]] have reviewed the current manifesto of the Apothecaries' Guild and have confirmed that it appears to be entirely constitutional. As part of that review, they have looked at what legal powers should logically be delegated to the new sodality in line with the legal authority granted to it by the [[~~Imperial~~ Senate]].		The [[Scrutiny#Constitutional_Court\|Constitutional Court]] have reviewed the current manifesto of the Apothecaries' Guild and have confirmed that it appears to be entirely constitutional. As part of that review, they have looked at what legal powers should logically be delegated to the new sodality in line with the legal authority granted to it by the [[Senate]].

	Most [[Powers of the Imperial Senate\|powers of state]] are obviously not appropriate - it would not be constitutional to give the Apothecaries' Guild the power to appoint [[general\|generals]], or assign a Bourse seat or anything of that nature. That is not because these powers are too important - the power of a sodality is not limited in that way - but any legal powers must align with the purpose and manifesto of the sodality.		Most [[Powers of the Imperial Senate\|powers of state]] are obviously not appropriate - it would not be constitutional to give the Apothecaries' Guild the power to appoint [[general\|generals]], or assign a Bourse seat or anything of that nature. That is not because these powers are too important - the power of a sodality is not limited in that way - but any legal powers must align with the purpose and manifesto of the sodality.
Line 59:		Line 59:
	* '''An administrative motion on Friday will ask the Senate to confirm that the sodality has the power to add new potions to Imperial lore'''		* '''An administrative motion on Friday will ask the Senate to confirm that the sodality has the power to add new potions to Imperial lore'''
	* '''The costs would remain the same - but the Guild could vote to add a potion to Imperial lore rather than needing a Senate motion'''		* '''The costs would remain the same - but the Guild could vote to add a potion to Imperial lore rather than needing a Senate motion'''
	The Imperial Senate has stated that the Apothecaries' Guild has the legal authority to "Coordinate... education, and dissemination of ingredients, potions, and antidotes." Currently, the responsibility for adding new potions and recipe sets to Imperial lore lies with the [[~~Imperial~~ Senate]]. It is not clear from the wording of the original [[Senate motion\|motion]] if the Senate intended to grant this power to the new sodality or not, but it does appear to be consistent with the purpose of the Apothecaries' Guild as defined by the Senate. Therefore, the constitutional court have prepared an administrative motion to confirm whether this was the Senate's intent or not. The motion will be presented to Senate on Friday night.		The Imperial Senate has stated that the Apothecaries' Guild has the legal authority to "Coordinate... education, and dissemination of ingredients, potions, and antidotes." Currently, the responsibility for adding new potions and recipe sets to Imperial lore lies with the [[Senate]]. It is not clear from the wording of the original [[Senate motion\|motion]] if the Senate intended to grant this power to the new sodality or not, but it does appear to be consistent with the purpose of the Apothecaries' Guild as defined by the Senate. Therefore, the constitutional court have prepared an administrative motion to confirm whether this was the Senate's intent or not. The motion will be presented to Senate on Friday night.

	At present, the only legal body with the power to do this is the Imperial Senate. It requires [[Potion#Herbal\|a Senate motion each time]] and costs 10 thrones. If the Senate passes the administrative motion, then the legal power to do this will be transferred to the new Guild.		At present, the only legal body with the power to do this is the Imperial Senate. It requires [[Potion#Herbal\|a Senate motion each time]] and costs 10 thrones. If the Senate passes the administrative motion, then the legal power to do this will be transferred to the new Guild.

Hailmur at 22:03, 6 June 2025

2025-06-06T22:03:07Z

Dre at 21:19, 6 June 2025

2025-06-06T21:19:44Z

Show changes

Dre: /* Legal Possibilities */

2025-06-06T21:18:28Z

Legal Possibilities

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:18, 6 June 2025
Line 46:		Line 46:
	* '''The Senate could devolve a number of powers to the sodality'''		* '''The Senate could devolve a number of powers to the sodality'''
	* '''Senate could grant the sodality the power to interdict potions'''		* '''Senate could grant the sodality the power to interdict potions'''
	The [[Scrutiny#Constitutional_Court\|Constitutional Court]] have reviewed the current manifesto of the Apothecaries Guild and have confirmed that it appears to be entirely constitutional. As part of that review, they have looked at what legal powers should logically be delegated to the new sodality in line with the legal authority granted to it by the [[Imperial Senate]].		The [[Scrutiny#Constitutional_Court\|Constitutional Court]] have reviewed the current manifesto of the Apothecaries' Guild and have confirmed that it appears to be entirely constitutional. As part of that review, they have looked at what legal powers should logically be delegated to the new sodality in line with the legal authority granted to it by the [[Imperial Senate]].

	Most [[Powers of the Imperial Senate\|powers of state]] are obviously not appropriate - it would not be constitutional to give the ~~Apothecary~~'s Guild the power to appoint [[general\|generals]], or assign a Bourse seat or anything of that nature. That is not because these powers are too important - the power of a sodality is not limited in that way - but any legal powers must align with the purpose and manifesto of the sodality.		Most [[Powers of the Imperial Senate\|powers of state]] are obviously not appropriate - it would not be constitutional to give the Apothecaries' Guild the power to appoint [[general\|generals]], or assign a Bourse seat or anything of that nature. That is not because these powers are too important - the power of a sodality is not limited in that way - but any legal powers must align with the purpose and manifesto of the sodality.

	However, there are legal powers that the court have identified that ought to reside with the Apothecaries Guild - in line with their manifesto. Any [[Senate motion]] carries the legal authority of the Empire, so it could be argued that the Senate has ''already'' made the decision by recognising the authority of the Apothecaries Guild. In practice, the Constitutional Court prefer to use [[Senate_motion#Administrative_Motions\|administrative motions]] so that they can confirm whether such changes accurately capture the intent of the Senate.		However, there are legal powers that the court have identified that ought to reside with the Apothecaries' Guild - in line with their manifesto. Any [[Senate motion]] carries the legal authority of the Empire, so it could be argued that the Senate has ''already'' made the decision by recognising the authority of the Apothecaries Guild. In practice, the Constitutional Court prefer to use [[Senate_motion#Administrative_Motions\|administrative motions]] so that they can confirm whether such changes accurately capture the intent of the Senate.

	In addition, there are current legal powers that ''could'' most logically be delegated to the Apothecaries Guild. There is no implication that these powers ''should'' now reside with the Apothecaries Guild in the wording of the manifesto that the Senate approved, so these have not been raised as an administrative motion. But they are clearly identified below, so that the Apothecaries Guild are aware that they could request the Senate authorise them to handle these matters without additional [[scrutiny]].		In addition, there are current legal powers that ''could'' most logically be delegated to the Apothecaries' Guild. There is no implication that these powers ''should'' now reside with the Apothecaries Guild in the wording of the manifesto that the Senate approved, so these have not been raised as an administrative motion. But they are clearly identified below, so that the Apothecaries Guild are aware that they could request the Senate authorise them to handle these matters without additional [[scrutiny]].

	There may well be other powers that the Imperial Senate could theoretically grant the new Apothecaries Guild; the two legal powers listed below are only the ones identified by the court at this stage.		There may well be other powers that the Imperial Senate could theoretically grant the new Apothecaries' Guild; the two legal powers listed below are only the ones identified by the court at this stage.
	{{CaptionedImage\|file=Mortar.webp\|title=Imperial Apothecaries' Guild\|align=right\|width=240}}		{{CaptionedImage\|file=Mortar.webp\|title=Imperial Apothecaries' Guild\|align=right\|width=240}}
	===Imperial Lore===		===Imperial Lore===

Dre at 21:17, 6 June 2025

2025-06-06T21:17:54Z

Show changes

Hailmur at 20:54, 6 June 2025

2025-06-06T20:54:28Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:03, 6 June 2025
Line 71:		Line 71:
	* '''It would be illegal to mix, own or sell an interdicted potion'''		* '''It would be illegal to mix, own or sell an interdicted potion'''
	* '''Magistrates would seek to destroy the herbal of an interdicted potion that was not part of Imperial Lore'''		* '''Magistrates would seek to destroy the herbal of an interdicted potion that was not part of Imperial Lore'''
	The Apothecaries' Guild is the only body of state with legally defined responsibilities for the ~~Apothecaries~~ art. However, the terms of the manifesto place significant limits on the power of the Guild to prevent the use of potions that pose a danger to the Empire or its citizens. It states that the sodality will ''"Serve as a point of contact for bodies of state when apothecary and herbal advice is required"''. The implication is that the intention is that the [[Imperial Conclave\|Conclave]] and the Senate continue to regulate the use of potions either by making them illegal with a Senate motion or by interdiction with a Conclave declaration.		The Apothecaries' Guild is the only body of state with legally defined responsibilities for the apothecary art. However, the terms of the manifesto place significant limits on the power of the Guild to prevent the use of potions that pose a danger to the Empire or its citizens. It states that the sodality will ''"Serve as a point of contact for bodies of state when apothecary and herbal advice is required"''. The implication is that the intention is that the [[Imperial Conclave\|Conclave]] and the Senate continue to regulate the use of potions either by making them illegal with a Senate motion or by interdiction with a Conclave declaration.

	The court are clear that the Senate ''could'' choose to grant the sodality the power to interdict potions or a single potion recipe. This would require a [[Senate_motion#Constitutional_Vote\|constitutional vote]] as it would strip the Conclave of any power or responsibility over potions and poisons. It would ~~still be possible for~~ the Imperial Senate ~~to make~~ the creation, sale, or use of such a potion ~~illegal with a Senate motion~~. Any existing potions that were interdicted would remain interdicted, but control of their status would pass to the Guild. A simple vote of Guild members would be sufficient to interdict a potion - or to remove interdiction from a potion.		The court are clear that the Senate ''could'' choose to grant the sodality the power to interdict potions or a single potion recipe. This would require a [[Senate_motion#Constitutional_Vote\|constitutional vote]] as it would strip the Conclave of any power or responsibility over potions and poisons. It would also prevent the Imperial Senate from making decisions on the creation, sale, or use of such a potion. Any existing potions that were interdicted would remain interdicted, but control of their status would pass to the Guild. A simple vote of Guild members would be sufficient to interdict a potion - or to remove interdiction from a potion.

	The power of [[interdiction]] would not remove a potion from Imperial lore. Any existing [[Potion#Herbal\|herbals]] would not be seized or destroyed, and it would not be illegal to possess one, nor to use one to learn or teach how to make the potion. Only the creation, ownership or sale of an interdicted potion would become illegal. On the other hand it would be possible to ~~also~~ grant the sodality the equivalent of the so-called ''[[Interdiction#Remorse\|Declaration of Remorse]]'', giving them the power to remove a potion recipe from Imperial lore.		The power of [[interdiction]] would not remove a potion from Imperial lore. Any existing [[Potion#Herbal\|herbals]] would not be seized or destroyed, and it would not be illegal to possess one, nor to use one to learn or teach how to make the potion. Only the creation, ownership or sale of an interdicted potion would become illegal. On the other hand, it would be possible to grant the sodality the equivalent of the so-called ''[[Interdiction#Remorse\|Declaration of Remorse]]'', giving them the power to remove a potion recipe from Imperial lore.

	A potion or recipe set that was ''not'' part of Imperial lore would be treated more severely. In addition to the above restrictions, any herbal would be seized and destroyed by the magistrates. It is never illegal to know how to mix a potion, unless the magistrates determine that someone is clearly intending to create the potion or spread that knowledge in which case they may require the use of effects such as [[Infant Starts with a Blank Slate]] to remove their capability to do so.		A potion or recipe set that was ''not'' part of Imperial lore would be treated more severely. In addition to the above restrictions, any herbal would be seized and destroyed by the magistrates. It is never illegal to know how to mix a potion, unless the magistrates determine that someone is clearly intending to create the potion or spread that knowledge, in which case they may require the use of effects such as [[Infant Starts with a Blank Slate]] to remove their capability to do so.

	If the Imperial Senate passed a constitutional motion to give the sodality the power to interdict potions and poisons, then it would also no longer be possible for the Senate to use a motion to make them illegal, as the legal power to do so would then rest with an Imperial body of state charged with responsibility for such matters. The Constitutional Court are keen to avoid the current mess in which the Conclave can interdict items and the Senate can make them illegal; this is only tolerated because the Conclave don't have a clear mandate under the Constitution to cover the creation and use of potions and [[magical items]], despite the best efforts of the [[Golden Pyramid]].		If the Imperial Senate passed a constitutional motion to give the sodality the power to interdict potions and poisons, then it would also no longer be possible for the Senate to use a motion to make them illegal, as the legal power to do so would then rest with an Imperial body of state charged with responsibility for such matters. The Constitutional Court are keen to avoid the current mess in which the Conclave can interdict items and the Senate can make them illegal; this is only tolerated because the Conclave don't have a clear mandate under the Constitution to cover the creation and use of potions and [[magical items]], despite the best efforts of the [[Golden Pyramid]].
Line 84:		Line 84:
	* '''Several groups of citizens are intrigued by the potential of the new sodality and have put forward proposals'''		* '''Several groups of citizens are intrigued by the potential of the new sodality and have put forward proposals'''
	* '''Updating the manifesto of the Apothecaries' Guild would require a constitutional Senate motion'''		* '''Updating the manifesto of the Apothecaries' Guild would require a constitutional Senate motion'''

	The new sodality has intrigued apothecaries and those interested in potions and herbs across the Empire. Many of them believe that the sodality was created in something of a hurry - in an attempt to seize an [[opportunity]] before it passed. Now that it exists, they sense there is a small window in time to consider changes to the manifesto before the thing becomes set in stone. As a result, each of them is pushing for some changes before they commit.		The new sodality has intrigued apothecaries and those interested in potions and herbs across the Empire. Many of them believe that the sodality was created in something of a hurry - in an attempt to seize an [[opportunity]] before it passed. Now that it exists, they sense there is a small window in time to consider changes to the manifesto before the thing becomes set in stone. As a result, each of them is pushing for some changes before they commit.

	Changing a manifesto of a sodality is expensive and difficult - it requires a constitutional motion which is not easily obtained. Given that challenge, each of the groups is promising aid to the new sodality if their requirements are satisfied. It seems unlikely that they could all be made happy, but in theory a single Senate motion could rewrite the entire manifesto, provided the new wording was constitutional.		Changing a manifesto of a sodality is expensive and difficult - it requires a constitutional motion which is not easily obtained. Given that challenge, each of the groups is promising aid to the new sodality if their requirements are satisfied. It seems unlikely that they could all be made happy, but in theory, a single Senate motion could rewrite the entire manifesto, provided the new wording was constitutional.

	===Contracts and Rings===		===Contracts and Rings===